Authority, structure, and organization

Get a 10% discount on an order above
Use the following coupon code :
Get10

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Write 1,050- to 1,400-word paper with the following sections:

  • Authority, structure, and organization click here for more information on this paper
    • Describe the authority structure of the plan’s implementation. This must describe who is responsible for implementing the plan. Include a description of each role involved in the plan:
    • Board of directors
    • Executive leadership
    • Quality improvement committee
    • Medical staff
    • Middle management
    • Department staff
  • Communication
    • Identify who the performance activity outcomes are communicated to and who does the communicating. This describes who is responsible for overseeing data collection and preparing data reports.
  • Education
    • Describe how staff will be educated regarding the plan. This covers how each staff member will be initially oriented to the plan and how each employee fits into the plan based on job responsibilities.
  • Annual evaluation
    • Describe what elements of the plan are annually evaluated for improvement.
    • Identify how to monitor the effect of changes implemented from the decision-making process.
  • External entities click here for more information on this paper
    • Describe the effect of external entities–governmental agencies, accrediting bodies, and professional interest groups–on the quality and performance measure of an organization’s decision-making processes.
  • Challenges
    • Identify barriers that can interfere with the implementation or revision of quality measures.
    • Determine strategies to ensure successful implementation of new quality measures.

Cite at least four sources to support your information.
 
Note: I have included my previous papers: QI Plan 1 and 2 for your review.
QI Plan Part 2
This methodology is chosen because in performance improvement it entails satisfactory of the patients, the process of delivery and improvement of the processes. The quality improvement (QI) is identified to focus on bringing out the gap in between the current levels of quality and the expected quality levels. The Quality Improvement uses the tools for managing quality together with the principles towards understanding and address systems deficiencies hence improving or re-designing efficiently the effective healthcare processes (Scales, 2014). Moreover, setting up a Quality Improvement process is termed to be an easy task but in order to integrate these processes in day to day activities, there have to be effective implementation via the leadership dedication, empowering of the employees, the healthy culture of business and the effectiveness of strategic planning that management has been embraced along with the desired performances.
The information technology applications include the Hospital Admission Risk Prediction (HARP) and the Episheet. In terms of improving the performance area, the HARP aims in predicting the future events, creating the intervention mechanism to the health care providers and generating the information regarding patient risk within future framework (Scales, 2014). The other application tool named Episheet is a qualitative tool which is applied in epidemiologic data analysis. It will help improve the performance area through gathering of the information and ensuring the priority of the healthcare organization.
In order to meet the performance improvement plan, innovation technology has to be considered in all applications. The IT applications are applied in an object oriented technology as well as in a computerized patient records systems and might also be used in the specific components of IT. Certainly, the object oriented technology would ensure that all different systems within the organization are connected and proper management (Hermann, 2005). The information technology entails the management of the patient’s records through computerization in order to prevent loss or from being accessed by the illegitimate persons. Furthermore, this aspect explores that for the use of the specific IT components, it is quite easy to monitor an organizational quality performance because the organization does not need change from the component directly to the other when delivering its services.
The quality indicators are identified as the guide to evaluation of the appropriate performance of an organization. The reason is that the performance is always evaluated continuously and at last at the end of the projects in a way that the organization carries out the process. Therefore, the benchmarks are termed as the programs as well as the operations which are set in order to make assessment of organizational performances. It is ideally achieved through some of the standards and run trial tests (Scales, 2014). In quality improvement, this enables in determining how effectively procedures which are being adhered to by an organization are analyzed. It is therefore through these aspects that the performance of the information technology within the organization is identified to have been reviewed. On the other side, milestones mark the end of the project, an end of a certain stage or particular step. Moreover, the performance is progressively monitored, improved and improved after milestones.
It is aligned with the performance mission, vision and the strategic plan in a way that healthcare’s provision targets goal by ensuring that each patient receives the quality health care services. The mission, vision and the strategic plan is to provide the appropriate satisfactory services to patients and work towards diverse population. The performance improvement is aligned with the plans of the health care organization through quality improvement and the patient’s satisfactory which have to be achieved. These tools have similarity like; they are used in evaluating the effectiveness of the health care services in healthcare organization settings. They attributed to the quality of services provided by the healthcare organization through directing the organization towards improvement on their services. Child Health Care Quality measurement is known to be much more concerned with children health quality. Meaning that, it contains information and also tools that can be used to evaluate the healthcare quality for children. It is based in the healthcare organization and the information that is evaluated is signifies health care organization (Hermann, 2005). The ambulatory care is used provision as well as evaluation of the health care organization readiness. It presents the tests regarding health quality preparedness along introducing a task. Contrary to the child healthcare Quality toolbox, the ambulatory care tool obtains information from people around.
References
Gao, Q. (2014). A Procedural Framework for Trans boundary Water Management in the Mekong River Basin Shared Mekong for a Common Future.
Hermann, R. (2005). Improving Mental Healthcare: A Guide to Measurement-Based Quality Improvement. Arlington: American Psychiatric Pub.
QI Plan Part 1
A performance measurement is a quality measure that is a method for evaluating the level to which a provider proficiently and carefully convey services that are suitable for the patient in the best possible time period. Quality measure is a mechanism that allocate a magnitude to quality of care to a criterion by comparison. So measuring performance is the only way to distinguish if the quality of care is improving. According to the Institute of Medicine, performance measurement enables quality improvement through the measurement of performance based upon quality indicators. Therefore, performance measurement can lead to the quality of monitoring.
Types of Information Each Tool Collect
Ontario Healthcare organization is our case of study since it uses a quality improvement plan in proving services offered to their customers. Ontario is one of the biggest healthcare organizations in the country. This organization has implemented a number of tools in their quality improvement plan. One of the tools it has used is Hospital Admission Risk Prediction (HARP). HARP is used in identifying patients at risk for future hospitalization. This tool is used in predicting future events. It also helps in creating an intervention mechanism to the health care providers to a patient who could experience challenging health episode. This tool generates information regarding the patient risk within future framework of about one to fifteen months. Ontario also uses Episheet a qualitative tool that is used in analyzing epidemiologic data. This data is used to support epidemiologists, statisticians and analysts in taking their analytical work. This tool is not used in gathering information but it is used to analyze some information in the healthcare organization to ensure that things are handled in accordance with the priority.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Each Tool for Each Area
Both HARP and Episheet are very important to the company. HARP to start with has some strength among. It can be used to predict the future of a sick person thus making it easy to identify the health conditions of a patient. It is basically used by the organization in preparation for the future since it predicts the patient future health. It cannot be relied on a first day patient. It is also considered hard to use and cannot just me used by any organization without a clear understanding about the tool. Episheet tool is also important since its information will help the organization in making informed decision regarding their health services to the community. Considering this tool, organization management will have precise information regarding the organization. It is also used to predict any risk that the health care organization might face. This gives the organization a chance to prepare before the problem strikes. The weakness of this tool is that it can only be used by some specialized people in generating the information required. Secondly, them that are trained are the only people who can decode the information given by the tool.
The Similarities and Differences of the Data Collection Tools
These two tools are similar in some way. First, they can both predict about the future occurrence of an event. For example, HARP is used to predict the future health of an individual and what to expect. On the other hand Episheet can be used to define the future of the hospital operations. Hospital financial needs, risks that can be ahead of the health care organization and the community health behavior in future can also be predicted by this tool. On top of that these two tools help in improving the health care services in the organization by preparing the management with the future possible occurrence. However, these tools can be considered not to be similar in one way. HARP tool is used in predicting the risk of the patient health care future complications while Episheet is basically used in predicting both risks and improvements of the organization future events. Therefore, the two tools are basically used in quality improvement.
Information Each Tool Measure and Display
Quality improvement in a health care setup can be measured by use of a number of tools. These tools may include the following: ambulatory care and child health care quality toolbox. These two tools are basically used in measuring quality improvement of the health care organization ambulatory care is a tool that is used in improving health care testing process. It is a toolkit for a rapid cycle patient safety and quality improvement. This tool helps in getting the test information on diseases in the health care organization for each and every patient that gets to the healthcare organization (Gao, 2014). It is also used in evaluating the electronic record about the patient health information. The second tool is the child health care quality toolbox. This is a tool that has information on how to evaluate the quality of the children health care. This information is displayed in a way that people can use and evaluate the child health care. It also gives the user a chance to understand the emerging issues and measures in the children healthcare.
Each Tool’s Strengths and Weaknesses click here for more information on this paper
These two tools have both advantages and disadvantages. The ambulatory care tool has some advantages that make it suitable for the health care organizations to use. The first thing is that it provides a method to test information quality in each and every health care record. This provides the organization with a chance to understand their direction in the performance and quality of their services. It also involves the patients in evaluating its effectiveness by giving patients surveys and handouts. The tool also helps in testing the organization processes and its effectiveness. Child Health Care Quality Toolbox also has some strength. It can be developed by any organization easily with the guidelines it provides. It is easy to develop and use. It provides care processes and achieves outcomes that are scientifically supported. It helps in providing information of equal quality to the patients that may have different characteristics. It also considered safe since it has no physical harm to the patient. It also helps in reducing delays in the healthcare services delivery. It is indeed a supportive tool that helps in improving quality of children healthcare service delivery.
Tools are Helpful for Health Care Organizations
These two tools are similar in some ways. First, they are basically used in evaluating the effectiveness of the health care services in a healthcare setup. Both are used to define and give a clear picture of the quality of services provided by the healthcare organization thus directing the organization on direction to take to improve their services. These tools are very much different. Child Health Care Quality measurement is more concerned about the children health quality. It contains information and tools that can be used to evaluate the quality of health care for children. It is based in the healthcare organization and the information that is evaluated is from the health care organization (Hermann, 2005). On the other hand the ambulatory care is used to evaluate the health care organization readiness. It tests the health quality preparedness with introducing a task. Unlike the child healthcare Quality toolbox, ambulatory care tool obtains information from people around. Therefore, these two tools differ more than their similarities.
Conclusion
Continued success of an organization is dependent upon the foundation strength on how the organization is built upon systems, process, tools and types of methods used by the organization to achieve benchmark standards. Strength and principles of a standard or product is defined by the sustainability of the product, concept, or belief. Frameworks consist of multiple dimensions of performance, organization factors and relationships. In addition, a framework is built upon current frameworks or different approaches developed to achieve successful quality improvement. Quality outcomes focus on the principles of quality management.
Reference
Gao, Q. (2014). A Procedural Framework for Trans boundary Water Management in the Mekong River Basin Shared Mekong for a Common Future.
Hermann, R. (2005). Improving Mental Healthcare: A Guide to Measurement-Based Quality Improvement. Arlington: American Psychiatric Pub.
Scales, D. C., & Rubenfeld, G. D. (2014). The organization of critical care: An evidence-based approach to improving quality.

Is this question part of your assignment?

We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 15% Discount

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper